Economic Relations between Kazakhstan and Russia 
p> Taking into account the differences between our countries in the
levels of development of market economy, in the democratization of
political processes, we propose to establish an additional integrative
structure, the Eurasian Union, whose activities would be combined with
those of the CIS. In doing so, the member states will take into account the
diversity of integration scenarios and differences in the rate, form, and
direction of CIS states’ development. Thus there is an urgent need for the
formation of a new economic order in the CIS.
It can thus be said that the draft project for the formation of the EAU is
in keeping with the natural aspirations of the peoples living in the post-
Soviet space, the idea of new integration. The project has not only
acquired a great many supporters but has also proved that it is realistic,
urgent, and vital. Turning to the genesis of that integrative idea, it must be recalled
that the Kazakhstan leader advocated the preservation of good relations and
re-integration on a new basis of the former Soviet republics from the very
first days of the new states acquiring independence. President Nazarbayev
stressed repeatedly that he never raised the idea of independence to the
status of a fetish but rather endeavored to preserve old ties and create
new ones. The idea of the Eurasian Union originates in the midst of life,
in the simple and universal human needs. From that moment, the debate on the idea of the EAU assumed a new
tone. It accelerated the political crystallization on the choice between
further disintegration and re-integration on a new basis. Many participants in the hearings stated that the EAU project offers a
chance for entering the 21st century in a civilized manner, and that it
reflects the objective logic of development of the post-Soviet space and
the consciously realized objective need for the development of integration
processes. In this way the initiative of forming the Eurasian Union was gaining
momentum. The number of its adherents increased at scholarly events, in
government offices, and in the diplomatic circles. An understanding and
sincere approval of the EAU project was expressed, among others. The proposals contained in the EAU project - to introduce unified visa
procedures, to guarantee the freedom of movement, to make the ruble the
settlement unit, to create a unified system of defense, parliament,
legislation, and an executive committee as an interstate organ - were at
first guardedly received by some public figures. However, the numbers of
adherents of integration are growing. Clearly, their approaches to the
problem differ, but their desire for integration remains strong. On the question of the main principles of the EAU project, it must be
stressed that the EAU is a union of equal, independent states aimed at the
realization of the national interests of each member state and of the
available integration potential. The EAU is a form of integration of
sovereign states with the aim of consolidating stability and security and
socioeconomic modernization in the post-Soviet space. Economic interests
determine the foundations of the rapprochement among the independent
states. The political institutions of the EAU must adequately reflect these
interests and facilitate economic integration. The following principles and mechanism of formation of the Eurasian
Union are proposed: — National referendums or decisions of parliaments on the entry of
states in the EAU; — The signing by member states of a treaty on the setting up of the EAU
on the basis of the principles of equality, noninterference in the affairs
of each other, respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity and
inviolability of state borders. The treaty must lay the legal and
organizational foundations for deeper integration, with the formation of an
economic, currency, and political union as its goal; — No associated membership is permitted in the EAU;
— Decisions are carried in the EAU by the qualified majority of four-fifths
(4/5) of the overall number of member countries. Independent states join the EAU, if the following preliminary
conditions are satisfied:
— Mandatory compliance with endorsed inter-state agreements; — Mutual recognition of the existing political institutions of the EAU
member countries; — Recognition of territorial integrity and inviolability of the
borders; — Rejection of economic, political, and other forms of pressure in
inter-state relations;
— Cessation of hostilities among member countries. New members enter the EAU after an expert evaluation is passed on
their readiness to enter the EAU and all EAU members vote unanimously on
it. An organ formed on parity terms by the states, which expressed their
readiness to become EAU members, proposes expert evaluations.
EAU states may take part in other integrative alliances, including the CIS,
on the basis of associated or permanent membership or in the role of an
observer. Every member can leave the EAU, giving notice not later than six
months before the decision is made.
It is suggested to form the following supranational bodies: — The Council of EAU Heads of State and Heads of Government - the
highest organ of EAU political leadership. Each member state chairs the EAU
for a period of six months in rotation according to the Cyrillic alphabet. — The highest consultative and advisory body is the EAU Parliament. The
Parliament is formed by delegating deputies of the member states'
parliaments on the basis of equal representation of each member country or
through direct elections. Decisions of the EAU Parliament come into force
after their ratification by the parliaments of the EAU states. Ratification
must be effected within the period of one month. — The main area of the activity of the EAU Parliament is coordination
of the member countries' legislation to insure the development of a unified
economic space, protection of the social rights and interests of
individuals and of mutual respect for state sovereignty and civil rights
within EAU states.
— The EAU Parliament creates a common legal basis to regulate the relations
between the member countries' economic agents.
— The Council of EAU Foreign Ministers, to coordinate the member countries'
foreign-policy activities.
— The Inter-state Executive Committee of the EAU - an executive and
supervisory body functioning on a permanent basis. The EAU heads of state
appoints the head of the Executive Committee -a representative of the
member countries — for a period defined by the heads. The Executive
Committee's bodies are formed to include representatives of all the
countries.
The EAU as represented by its Executive Committee must receive observer
status in a number of major international organizations, such as:
— The EAU Executive Committee's Information Bureau. The member countries
must assume a special obligation or law not to permit unfriendly statements
about the treaty's member states, which may damage relations between them.
— The Council for Education, Culture, and Science. The formation of
coordinated policy on education, promotion of cultural and scientific
cooperation and exchange, and joint activity on compiling textbooks and
manuals.
— To achieve a deeper coordination and effectiveness of the activities of
the EAU countries, it is deemed advisable to set up in each of them a State
Committee (or Ministry) for EAU Affairs.
— Regular meetings and consultations on health services, education, labor,
employment, culture, combating crime, and so on, by ministers of EAU
countries. . Encouraging the activities of non-governmental organizations in various areas of cooperation in accordance with EAU member countries' national legislation. — The Russian language is the official EAU language, functioning side by side with the languages of legislation in the member nations. — Citizenship. Free movement of citizens within EAU borders requires
coordination of external visa policy with regard to third nations. On
changing the country of residence within the EAU, an individual
automatically receives the other country's membership.
— One of the cities at the juncture of Europe and Asia, such as Kazan or
Samara, might be proposed as the capital of the EAU.
In order to create a unified economic space within the EAU framework, it is
proposed to establish a number of supranational coordinating structures: — A commission on the economy under the Council of EAU Heads of State
to work out the main directions of economic reform within the EAU
framework; the commission takes into consideration the interests of the
national states and offers its proposals for endorsement by the Council of
the EAU Heads of State; — A commission on the raw materials of the EAU exporter countries to
coordinate and endorse the prices and quotas for exported raw materials and
fuel and energy resources, an appropriate inter-state agreement to be
signed by the member countries; coordination of policy in the mining and
sale of gold and other precious metals is to be envisaged; — A fund for economic and technological cooperation formed with EAU
members' contributions. The fund will finance promising science-intensive
economic, scientific, and technological programs and render assistance in
the solution of a wide range of problems, including legal, tax, financial,
and ecological issues; — A commission on inter-state financial-industrial groups and joint
ventures; — an EAU international investment bank;
— An inter-state EAU court of arbitration on economic problems, to resolve
conflicts on a legal basis and to impose sanctions;
— A commission on the introduction of a clearance monetary unit (transfer
ruble).
It is proposed to implement a number of measures to preserve the potential
achieved in the previous decades and to enhance integration in the field of
science, culture, and education:
— The setting up of common EAU research centers to carry out fundamental
research in contemporary knowledge;
— The setting up of an EAU fund for the development of scientific research
to unite the scientific collectives from various countries;
— The setting up of a committee on links in the field of culture, science,
and education under the Council of the Heads of EAU Governments;
— Encouragement of the formation of non-governmental associations in the
sphere of culture, education, and science;
— The setting up of a grants fund under the EAU Executive Committee.
It is proposed to conclude the following accords on defense within the EAU
framework:
— A treaty on joint actions to strengthen the national Armed Forces of the
EAU member countries and to protect EAU external borders.
The EAU will establish a unified defense space to coordinate defense
activities: . The formation of joint peace-making EAU forces to maintain stability and eliminate conflicts within the member countries and between them. The sending of peace-making forces to conflict areas on EAU territory - with the agreement of EAU member states and in accordance with international legal norms; . The tabling of joint proposals by EAU member countries at international organizations, including the United Nations Security Council, on lending EAU joint contingents the status of a peace-making force;
— The setting up of an inter-state center on problems of nuclear
disarmament attended by representatives of international organizations.
— All EAU states except Russia maintain their nuclear-free status. In the area of ecology, the following mechanisms must be formed in the
nearest future, according to the EAU project:
— An ecological fund under the EAU Council of Heads of State, to realize
ecological programs within the EAU framework, to be financed by all member
states;
— Coordination of actions with international organizations to reduce the
extent of environmental pollution;
— Endorsement of short- and long-term programs for major problems of
restoration of the environment and liquidation of the consequences of
ecological disasters (the Aral Sea, Chernobyl, the Semipalatinsk nuclear
testing ground);
— The endorsement of an inter-state EAU agreement on storing nuclear waste.
The Eurasian Union of States is thus based on three principal provisions:
— Joint supranational coordinating organs for the management of the
economy, defense, and foreign policy;
— A unified economic space;
— A common defense complex.
The supranational institutions include the highest organ of political
leadership of the Union - the council of heads of state and heads of
government; the highest consultative organ, the parliament; the councils of
foreign and defense ministers; And the interstate executive committee - a permanently functioning
executive and controlling body whose head is appointed by the heads of
government for a term which they themselves define.
As for the unified economic space, it may be built, e.g., on such a basis
as coordinating economic policies and mandatory programs; a common
legislative basis regulating relations between economic agents; a
supranational currency on the European ECU model; coordination of direct
links between enterprises; the setting up of joint and mixed industrial-
financial groups, transport firms, trade houses, and exchanges. The defense
and foreign trade complexes may be just as effective. The EAU as
represented by its executive committee must receive the status of an
authorized representative in all the leading interstate organizations of
the world. The practical realization of the provisions of the EAU project in the
bilateral Kazakhstan!-Russian relations is excellent proof of the viability
of this program. On January 20, 1995, a package of extremely important integration
documents was signed during the working meeting between presidents
Nazarbayev and Yeltsin. This package included a declaration on expanding
and deepening Kazakh-stani-Russian cooperation and an agreement on the
Customs Union, which was also signed by Belorussia. Both of these were
discussed in detail before. This last agreement opens the way to the
establishment of a unified customs space to be followed by a unified
economic space, as envisioned in the EAU project. With the setting up of the Customs Union, the economic cooperation of
the three countries is built on the principles of free, non-discriminatory
trade; a common market of commodities, services, capital, and labor; and
close interaction in the production, investment, and financial spheres. At present, the first stage in the formation of the Customs Union is
largely completed. The work done by the three sides is generally recognized
to be an important element of the realization of the foundations of the
Economic Union and the formation of the common market of CIS countries.
The legal acts on tariff and non-tariff regulation of foreign trade have
been unified. Kazakhstan and Russia have signed an agreement on unified
control of customs services. An agreement has also been reached on the
identity of trade procedures in both countries in relation to third
nations, and unified procedures have been introduced on the customs
statistics on foreign trade and customs registration of commodities subject
to excise. Customs controls on railroads and passenger air traffic between
the two countries are lifted step by step. A treaty has been signed between the Republic of Kazakhstan and the
Russian Federation on joint efforts on the protection of outer borders, the
term “outer borders” taken to mean the sectors of the border between our
countries and the states that are not part of the CIS. The edict of the
president of Kazakhstan dated September 19, 1995 On the Lifting of Customs
Control on the Border between the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Russian
Federation concludes the first stage in the formation of the Customs Union
and orders the implementation of joint customs controls on the Kazakhstan
and Russian sectors of the outer borders of the Customs Union. At the second stage of the formation of Kazakhstani-Russian-
Belorussian economic efforts to form a customs union, the most important
areas of cooperation are a closer coordination of economic reforms;
harmonization of civil and economic legislation; unification of currency,
tax, and price regulation by the state with the aim of leveling out the
economic and legal conditions for the activities of commodity producers
within a unified customs space; working out coordinated positions of the
members of the Customs Union in relations with third countries and
international organizations. At the meeting of heads of CIS countries in
November 1995, three more countries stated their desire to join the Customs
Union: Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan. Later, only Kyrgyzstan went
through with the necessary procedures and entered the Customs Union.
Another example of collaboration in the field of integration is the
agreement on the Baikonur space vehicle-launching site, which makes it
possible to use this great scientific and technological facility in the
interests of Russia and Kazakhstan, as well as documents on the issues of
citizenship signed by the presidents of Kazakhstan and Russian. Let us consider in somewhat greater detail the problems of
citizenship, of which the solution on a bilateral basis was also outlined
in the draft project of the EAU. Issues of citizenship became particularly prominent at the time of the
emergence and building of sovereign independent states after the
disintegration of the USSR, when tens of millions of former Soviet citizens
overnight ended up outside their "historical homelands." This problem is as
topical for Kazakhstan and Russia as for other CIS countries. More than
that, it often figures as one of the most important issues of bilateral
relations with Russia. The more acute aspects of this problem were lifted as a result of the
signing in January 1995 by the presidents of Russia and Kazakhstan of a
treaty on the legal status of citizens of both countries living on the
territory of the other state and of an agreement on simplified procedures
for acquiring citizenship in moving from one country to another. Well-known
specialists from the two countries worked fruitfully on these documents.
Authoritative Kazakhstan! and Russian politicians and jurists believe that
these are innovative agreements without parallel in the world, and they are
a fairly rare example of regulating bilateral issues on a civilized basis.
The importance of these agreements both for progressive development of our
countries and for normal life of the citizens of Kazakhstan and Russia
cannot be exaggerated.
Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
|